Deloitte
Multistate Tax  |  January 7, 2022
Global InSight
State Tax Matters
The power of knowing.
 

Print Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Income/Franchise:
Idaho State Tax Commission Addresses New Passthrough Entity-Level Tax Election

ad

Notice: More SALT Guidance, Idaho State Tax Comm. (12/20/21). The Idaho State Tax Commission (Commission) issued guidance reflecting state legislation enacted in 2021 that permits certain passthrough entities (PTEs) to elect to pay Idaho income tax at the entity level applicable retroactively to January 1, 2021 [see H.B. 317 (2021) and previously issued Multistate Tax Alert for more details on this new law], which was enacted in response to the $10,000 cap on the federal individual income tax deduction for state and local taxes that was enacted in the 2017 federal tax overhaul legislation known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (i.e., P.L. 115-97). In doing so, the Commission explains that Idaho allows certain PTEs to annually elect and pay an elective tax in the amount of 6.5% of the pro-rata or distributive share of the entity’s partners, shareholders, or members; in turn, the partners, shareholders, and members receive a tax credit equal to that amount.

 

Furthermore, the Commission explains that election to pay the new tax must be made on the qualifying PTE’s original, timely-filed return and is irrevocable for the taxable year. The guidance additionally provides that members still report on their federal and state tax returns their share of the income that passes through to them from the PTE, but they can claim a credit for the tax paid by the entity equal to the amount of their share of ownership in the entity multiplied by the tax paid by the affected business entity. Such credit is available to individual and corporate members of the affected PTE. Please contact us with any questions.

 

—

Scott Schiefelbein (Portland)

Managing Director

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Gregory Bergmann (Chicago)

Partner

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Olivia Schulte (Washington, DC)

Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

 



Back to top
 
In this issue

Administrative
Oregon DOR Launches its Newly Established Office of the Taxpayer Advocate

Income/Franchise
Alabama DOR Adopts Rules on Pass-through Entity-Level Tax and Financial Institution Excise Tax

Alabama: Adopted Rule Changes Reflect Move from Double-Weighted to Single Sales Factor

California FTB Adopts New and Revised Regulations on Assignment of Corporate Income Tax Credits

Colorado DOR Discusses Law Changes Involving Listed Tax Havens and Combined Return Inclusion

Colorado DOR Adopts Special Industry Apportionment Rule Addressing Hedging Transactions

Hawaii Department of Taxation Explains New REIT Reporting Obligation, Penalties and January 15 Deadline

Idaho State Tax Commission Addresses New Passthrough Entity-Level Tax Election

Massachusetts DOR Posts Working Draft Release on New Entity-Level Taxation for Some Pass-through Entities

Michigan Department of Treasury Explains New Passthrough Entity Tax Election

Oregon DOR Adopts Various CAT Rule Changes

Oregon DOR Adopts New Rule Defining Terms for and Application of Sourcing Broadcasting Sales

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules on Remedy Stemming from NOL Statutory Cap Invalidation Decision

South Carolina DOR Extends COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Telecommuting Relief through to March 31

Wisconsin: Receipts from Company’s Sale of Credits Deemed Characterized as Apportionable Income

Sales/Use/Indirect
Colorado DOR Explains Transition to Destination Sourcing and Mandated Compliance for All

Michigan Administrative Guidance Explains Remote Seller and Marketplace Facilitator Economic Nexus

New York ALJ Says Online Loan Marketplace’s Services are Not Taxable Information Services

Texas: Adopted Rule Changes Define “Bad Debt Credit” Terms and Reflect Underlying Policy

Texas: Taxpayer Deemed a Qualified “Manufacturer” Eligible for Electricity Purchase Exemption

Virginia: True Object of Remotely Accessible Security Systems is a Nontaxable Service

Washington DOR Explains Order Invalidating Portions of B&O Tax Sourcing Rule and Refund Impact

Other/Miscellaneous
Maryland Comptroller Adopts Rules for New Digital Advertising Tax

Oregon Supreme Court Affirms E911 Tax Imposition Does Not Violate Due Process or Commerce Clauses

Multistate Tax Alerts



Helpful resources

Visit Deloitte.com

State tax Matters archive

Multistate Tax Alert archive

Read Accounting for Income Taxes

Join Dbriefs

Follow us on Twitter
Get the Tax@hand mobile app



Have a question?

If you have needs specifically related to this newsletter's content, send us an email to have a Deloitte Tax professional contact you.
 

Deloitte.com  | Manage email preferences  |  Legal  |  Privacy

30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0015
United States

About Deloitte
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”). DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and related entities are legally separate and independent entities, which cannot obligate or bind each other in respect of third parties. DTTL and each DTTL member firm and related entity is liable only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of each other. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

Copyright © 2022 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
36 USC 220506



Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google Plus Email