Deloitte
Multistate Tax  |  January 7, 2022
Global InSight
State Tax Matters
The power of knowing.
 

Print Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Sales/Use/Indirect:
Washington DOR Explains Order Invalidating Portions of B&O Tax Sourcing Rule and Refund Impact

ad

Interim Guidance Statement, Wash. Dept. of Rev. (12/20/21). The Washington Department of Revenue (Department) issued guidance addressing the impact of a May 2021 Washington county court ruling that deemed Wash. Admin. Code section 458-20-19402 (i.e., “Rule 19402”) – involving market sourcing and apportionment for state business and occupation (B&O) tax purposes – invalid to the extent it requires taxpayers to use proportional attribution for tax periods before June 12, 2014. In doing so, the Department explains that this court order does not impact Rule 19402 for periods on or after June 12, 2014, as the taxpayer’s underlying challenge and resulting court order involved the Department exceeding its authority with Rule 19402 for periods before the enactment of statutory amendments on June 12, 2014 that explicitly allow for proportional attribution.

 

The Department explains that because it did not appeal this recent county court order, B&O taxpayers potentially may qualify for a refund for taxes paid if:

  • The taxpayer used proportional attribution, as instructed by Rule 19402, when calculating its receipts factor for periods before June 12, 2014, and
  • This calculation resulted in overpayment of taxes for any relevant open period(s).

The Department warns that failure to submit a timely refund application may bar a potential refund claim. The Department also explains that it will review any refund requests implicating this recent court decision and pre- June 12, 2014 tax periods on a case-by-case basis, and plans to issue a related excise tax advisory (ETA) in early 2022 to further address the effects of the case. Please contact us with any questions.

 

—

Robert Wood (Seattle)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

Myles Brenner (Seattle)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP



Back to top
 
In this issue

Administrative
Oregon DOR Launches its Newly Established Office of the Taxpayer Advocate

Income/Franchise
Alabama DOR Adopts Rules on Pass-through Entity-Level Tax and Financial Institution Excise Tax

Alabama: Adopted Rule Changes Reflect Move from Double-Weighted to Single Sales Factor

California FTB Adopts New and Revised Regulations on Assignment of Corporate Income Tax Credits

Colorado DOR Discusses Law Changes Involving Listed Tax Havens and Combined Return Inclusion

Colorado DOR Adopts Special Industry Apportionment Rule Addressing Hedging Transactions

Hawaii Department of Taxation Explains New REIT Reporting Obligation, Penalties and January 15 Deadline

Idaho State Tax Commission Addresses New Passthrough Entity-Level Tax Election

Massachusetts DOR Posts Working Draft Release on New Entity-Level Taxation for Some Pass-through Entities

Michigan Department of Treasury Explains New Passthrough Entity Tax Election

Oregon DOR Adopts Various CAT Rule Changes

Oregon DOR Adopts New Rule Defining Terms for and Application of Sourcing Broadcasting Sales

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules on Remedy Stemming from NOL Statutory Cap Invalidation Decision

South Carolina DOR Extends COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Telecommuting Relief through to March 31

Wisconsin: Receipts from Company’s Sale of Credits Deemed Characterized as Apportionable Income

Sales/Use/Indirect
Colorado DOR Explains Transition to Destination Sourcing and Mandated Compliance for All

Michigan Administrative Guidance Explains Remote Seller and Marketplace Facilitator Economic Nexus

New York ALJ Says Online Loan Marketplace’s Services are Not Taxable Information Services

Texas: Adopted Rule Changes Define “Bad Debt Credit” Terms and Reflect Underlying Policy

Texas: Taxpayer Deemed a Qualified “Manufacturer” Eligible for Electricity Purchase Exemption

Virginia: True Object of Remotely Accessible Security Systems is a Nontaxable Service

Washington DOR Explains Order Invalidating Portions of B&O Tax Sourcing Rule and Refund Impact

Other/Miscellaneous
Maryland Comptroller Adopts Rules for New Digital Advertising Tax

Oregon Supreme Court Affirms E911 Tax Imposition Does Not Violate Due Process or Commerce Clauses

Multistate Tax Alerts



Helpful resources

Visit Deloitte.com

State tax Matters archive

Multistate Tax Alert archive

Read Accounting for Income Taxes

Join Dbriefs

Follow us on Twitter
Get the Tax@hand mobile app



Have a question?

If you have needs specifically related to this newsletter's content, send us an email to have a Deloitte Tax professional contact you.
 

Deloitte.com  | Manage email preferences  |  Legal  |  Privacy

30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0015
United States

About Deloitte
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”). DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and related entities are legally separate and independent entities, which cannot obligate or bind each other in respect of third parties. DTTL and each DTTL member firm and related entity is liable only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of each other. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

Copyright © 2022 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
36 USC 220506



Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google Plus Email