Deloitte
Multistate Tax  |  January 7, 2022
Global InSight
State Tax Matters
The power of knowing.
 

Print Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Income/Franchise:
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules on Remedy Stemming from NOL Statutory Cap Invalidation Decision

ad

Case No. 12 MAP 2020, Pa. (12/22/21). In a case involving whether a taxpayer could claim unlimited net operating loss (NOL) carryovers against its Pennsylvania corporate net income tax (CNIT) for a prior tax year (i.e., a pre-2017 tax year) in light of a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling from 2017 – which held that the fixed-dollar statutory cap on Pennsylvania’s NOL carryover deduction as applied to that taxpayer and year at issue violated the Uniformity Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution – the Pennsylvania Supreme Court (Court) affirmed the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court’s 2019 ruling to the extent it deemed the 2017 decision to apply retroactively to control the case at issue (i.e., for a tax year when there was only a fixed-dollar statutory cap and no percentage cap on Pennsylvania NOLs). However, the Court reversed the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court to the extent it remedied the Pennsylvania Constitution Uniformity Clause violation by severing the $2 million NOL carryover deduction cap, concluding instead that the “proper remedy” is to sever the NOL carryover deduction provision in its entirety for the 2001 tax year at issue. The Court ultimately did affirm the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court’s 2019 order to the extent it remands to the Pennsylvania Finance and Review Board to recalculate the taxpayer’s CNIT without capping its NOL carryover deduction and to issue a refund based upon that recalculation – which the Court concluded “is required to remedy the due process violation” of the taxpayer’s rights to meaningful relief to remedy the discriminatory effect. Two dissenting opinions follow (see Saylor and Wecht dissenting opinions). Please contact us with any questions.

 

—

Kenn Stoops (Philadelphia)

Managing Director

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Stacy Ip-Mo (Philadelphia)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Bob Kovach (Pittsburgh)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

John Damin (Philadelphia)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP



Back to top
 
In this issue

Administrative
Oregon DOR Launches its Newly Established Office of the Taxpayer Advocate

Income/Franchise
Alabama DOR Adopts Rules on Pass-through Entity-Level Tax and Financial Institution Excise Tax

Alabama: Adopted Rule Changes Reflect Move from Double-Weighted to Single Sales Factor

California FTB Adopts New and Revised Regulations on Assignment of Corporate Income Tax Credits

Colorado DOR Discusses Law Changes Involving Listed Tax Havens and Combined Return Inclusion

Colorado DOR Adopts Special Industry Apportionment Rule Addressing Hedging Transactions

Hawaii Department of Taxation Explains New REIT Reporting Obligation, Penalties and January 15 Deadline

Idaho State Tax Commission Addresses New Passthrough Entity-Level Tax Election

Massachusetts DOR Posts Working Draft Release on New Entity-Level Taxation for Some Pass-through Entities

Michigan Department of Treasury Explains New Passthrough Entity Tax Election

Oregon DOR Adopts Various CAT Rule Changes

Oregon DOR Adopts New Rule Defining Terms for and Application of Sourcing Broadcasting Sales

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules on Remedy Stemming from NOL Statutory Cap Invalidation Decision

South Carolina DOR Extends COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Telecommuting Relief through to March 31

Wisconsin: Receipts from Company’s Sale of Credits Deemed Characterized as Apportionable Income

Sales/Use/Indirect
Colorado DOR Explains Transition to Destination Sourcing and Mandated Compliance for All

Michigan Administrative Guidance Explains Remote Seller and Marketplace Facilitator Economic Nexus

New York ALJ Says Online Loan Marketplace’s Services are Not Taxable Information Services

Texas: Adopted Rule Changes Define “Bad Debt Credit” Terms and Reflect Underlying Policy

Texas: Taxpayer Deemed a Qualified “Manufacturer” Eligible for Electricity Purchase Exemption

Virginia: True Object of Remotely Accessible Security Systems is a Nontaxable Service

Washington DOR Explains Order Invalidating Portions of B&O Tax Sourcing Rule and Refund Impact

Other/Miscellaneous
Maryland Comptroller Adopts Rules for New Digital Advertising Tax

Oregon Supreme Court Affirms E911 Tax Imposition Does Not Violate Due Process or Commerce Clauses

Multistate Tax Alerts



Helpful resources

Visit Deloitte.com

State tax Matters archive

Multistate Tax Alert archive

Read Accounting for Income Taxes

Join Dbriefs

Follow us on Twitter
Get the Tax@hand mobile app



Have a question?

If you have needs specifically related to this newsletter's content, send us an email to have a Deloitte Tax professional contact you.
 

Deloitte.com  | Manage email preferences  |  Legal  |  Privacy

30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0015
United States

About Deloitte
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”). DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and related entities are legally separate and independent entities, which cannot obligate or bind each other in respect of third parties. DTTL and each DTTL member firm and related entity is liable only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of each other. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

Copyright © 2022 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
36 USC 220506



Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google Plus Email