Deloitte
Multistate Tax  |  March 11, 2022
Global InSight
State Tax Matters
The power of knowing.
 

Print Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Gross Receipts:
Virginia BPOL Ruling Addresses Payroll Factor Calculation Involving In-State Remote Workers

Public Document No. 21-131, Va. Dept. of Tax. (9/28/21). In an administrative ruling involving a global company with employees working both at its Virginia office located within a certain Virginia county (County) and remotely from residences throughout Virginia, the Virginia Department of Taxation (Department) held in the company’s favor in part that it must compute its payroll apportionment numerator for purposes of the County’s business, professional and occupational license (BPOL) tax based only on payroll attributed to the definite place of business in that County. In doing so, the Department rejected the County’s attempt to compute the company’s BPOL payroll apportionment numerator by including the payroll of all its employees who worked in Virginia, concluding that any employees who worked remotely from homes outside of the County must be excluded from the numerator.

 

The company’s proposed calculation methodology of the payroll apportionment numerator was to include only those employees working at the County location or those Virginia remote workers who reported to the County office. The Department clarified, however, that the payroll apportionment numerator “should not include any employees who worked remotely outside of the County, regardless of what office they reported to.” In making this clarification, the Department explained that requiring the payroll of home-based employees to be apportioned using the suggested “direction and control basis” for BPOL tax purposes “would reintroduce the types of factual complexities that payroll apportionment was designed to avoid,” and thus the company “could not commingle another situs rule with payroll apportionment.”

 

Further, in responding to the County’s reference to state corporate income tax caselaw from other jurisdictions, the Department reasoned that a taxpayer’s activities within a “state as a whole” would be relevant in determining the taxpayer’s liability for such type of tax but that the BPOL tax “is a local tax separate and distinct from a state-level corporate income tax” and thus “has no relevance whatsoever on the issue presented.” Please contact us with any questions.

 

—

Joe Carr (McLean)

Managing Director

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Jennifer Alban-Bond (McLean)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Ryan Trent (Charlotte)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

Lauren Pflugrath (Charlotte)

Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP



Back to top
 
In this issue

Income/Franchise
Indiana DOR Addresses Nexus, Combined Filing and Business Income Under FIT

Maine: Proposed Rules Reflect New Bright-Line Nexus Standard Under Corporate Income Tax

Montana DOR Explains State Treatment of Federal RARs & Partnership Audit Regime Changes

New Mexico: New Law Offers Elective Entity-Level Taxation for Some PTEs

Gross Receipts
Virginia BPOL Ruling Addresses Payroll Factor Calculation Involving In-State Remote Workers

Indirect/Sales/Use
North Carolina: Private Letter Ruling Addresses if Online Platform is a Marketplace Facilitator

Other/Miscellaneous
Maryland: Federal Judge Partially Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging New Digital Advertising Tax

Multistate Tax Alerts



Helpful resources

Visit Deloitte.com

State tax Matters archive

Multistate Tax Alert archive

Read Accounting for Income Taxes

Join Dbriefs

Follow us on Twitter
Get the Tax@hand mobile app



Have a question?

If you have needs specifically related to this newsletter's content, send us an email to have a Deloitte Tax professional contact you.
 

Deloitte.com  | Manage email preferences  |  Legal  |  Privacy

30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0015
United States

About Deloitte
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”). DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and related entities are legally separate and independent entities, which cannot obligate or bind each other in respect of third parties. DTTL and each DTTL member firm and related entity is liable only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of each other. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

Copyright © 2022 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
36 USC 220506



Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google Plus Email