Deloitte
Multistate Tax  |  January 14, 2022
Global InSight
State Tax Matters
The power of knowing.
 

Print Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Income/Franchise:
Massachusetts: New Release Addresses State Treatment Arising from Federal Partnership Audit Changes

ad

Technical Information Release (TIR) 22-1, Mass. Dept. of Rev. (1/6/22). The Massachusetts Department of Revenue (Department) adopted a technical information release (TIR 22-1) addressing certain provisions within the Massachusetts Fiscal Year 2021 Budget [see H.5164 (2020) for more details on this new law], specifically those involving partnerships that are the subject of a federal audit under the centralized federal partnership audit regime and how Massachusetts is responding to certain changes in the federal partnership audit and adjustment process. TIR 22-1 explains the new Massachusetts partnership tax audit provisions at G.L. c. 62C, § 30B (“§ 30B”), and describes the Massachusetts reporting and payment obligations of partnerships and partners that are subject to a centralized federal partnership audit. According to TIR 22-1, partnerships are subject to § 30B, including the notice requirements described within it, in any instance in which, as a result of a federal audit, there is a difference in the Massachusetts tax liability of any partner from that previously reported – and the “triggering event” for these obligations generally is the “final determination date” and includes a federal administrative adjustment issued to the partnership. TIR 22-1 also explains that the Department has developed a process that will allow partnerships to report federal audit adjustments and report and pay audit assessments on behalf of their partners through its electronic tax system (i.e., MassTaxConnect).

 

Note that previously issued administrative guidance [see Technical Information Release (TIR) 21-4: Tax Provisions in the Fiscal Year 2021 Budget, Mass. Dept. of Rev. (3/31/21)] explains that § 30B includes provisions that:

  • Require audited partnerships to amend their Massachusetts nonresident composite returns or withholding reports;
  • Allow audited partnerships to make an election to pay state tax on behalf of their partners; and
  • Require partners in an audited partnership to directly pay state tax in certain instances.

Please contact us with any questions.

 

—

Bob Carleo (Boston)

Managing Director

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Alexis Morrison-Howe (Boston)

Principal

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Gregory Bergmann (Chicago)

Partner

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Shawn David (Boston)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Ian Gilbert (Boston)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

Olivia Schulte (Washington, DC)

Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP



Back to top
 
In this issue

Income/Franchise
Illinois DOR Appears to Decline Convenience of Employer Rule for Nonresident Withholding

Massachusetts: New Release Addresses State Treatment Arising from Federal Partnership Audit Changes

Massachusetts Appellate Tax Board Says Taxpayer is a Manufacturer Under Corporate Excise Tax

New York City: Court Denies Use of 2008 NOL in Computing City Tax and Says State and City NOL Lookback Periods Do Not Have to Match

North Carolina: Summary Highlights Recent Law Changes Including IRC § 163(j)-Related Provisions

Pennsylvania: Court Says Philadelphia Validly Denied Wage Tax Credit for Taxes Paid to Other State

Virginia DOT Responds to Ruling Request on PTE SALT Cap Workaround and Credit for Taxes Paid to Another State

Sales/Use/Indirect
California: Upcoming Public Hearing Will Address Proposed Changes to Marketplace Sales Regulation

California: Upcoming Public Hearing Will Address Audit Manual Changes on Statistical Sampling

Illinois DOR Addresses Taxation of Service Provider’s SaaS and Cloud-Based Remote Work Tools

New Mexico: Determining GRT Location Code and Rate for Professional Services

New York: Marketer’s Subscriptions and Information Reports for Distributors Deemed Not Taxable

Tennessee DOR Explains Procedures Under Recently Repealed Drop Shipment Rule for Suppliers

Gross Receipts and Other/Miscellaneous
Tennessee Appellate Court Affirms that Business Tax is Due on Retail Rather than Wholesale Rate

Multistate Tax Alerts



Helpful resources

Visit Deloitte.com

State tax Matters archive

Multistate Tax Alert archive

Read Accounting for Income Taxes

Join Dbriefs

Follow us on Twitter
Get the Tax@hand mobile app



Have a question?

If you have needs specifically related to this newsletter's content, send us an email to have a Deloitte Tax professional contact you.
 

Deloitte.com  | Manage email preferences  |  Legal  |  Privacy

30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0015
United States

About Deloitte
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”). DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and related entities are legally separate and independent entities, which cannot obligate or bind each other in respect of third parties. DTTL and each DTTL member firm and related entity is liable only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of each other. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

Copyright © 2022 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
36 USC 220506



Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google Plus Email