Deloitte
Multistate Tax  |  September 17, 2021
Global InSight
State Tax Matters
The power of knowing.
 

Print Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Income/Franchise:
Pennsylvania Court Upholds DOR Policy that 2017 NOL Cap Ruling Doesn’t Apply to Earlier Years

ad

Case No. 803 F.R. 2017, Pa. Commw. Ct. (9/13/21). In a case involving application of the percentage cap for “net loss carryover” (NLC) deductions contained under Pennsylvania law for the 2014 tax year at issue following the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s 2017 decision concerning the NLC deduction – which held that the fixed-dollar statutory cap of $3 million on Pennsylvania’s net operating loss carryover deduction, as applied to that taxpayer and year at issue, violated the Uniformity Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution [see previously issued Multistate Tax Alert for more details on this 2017 decision] – a Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court (Court) effectively affirmed the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue (Department) policy implementing the 2017 decision prospectively by removing the flat-dollar deduction beginning in 2017 and thereafter [see “Corporation Tax Bulletin 2018-02 – Net Operating Loss Deduction (NOL)“ for more details on this Department policy, which generally allows taxpayers to claim the greater of the flat dollar cap or the percentage cap as authorized by statute before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s 2017 decision]. The taxpayer in this case argued for an unlimited NLC deduction, claiming that the prospective-only application of the 2017 case unconstitutionally subjected only large corporate taxpayers to the percentage cap and excluded application to small corporate taxpayers for tax years beginning prior to January 1, 2017.

 

Agreeing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s 2017 decision should be applied on a prospective-only basis as it did not meet the US Supreme Court’s retroactivity test under the circumstances, the Court reasoned that the taxpayer in this case:

  1. Cannot “avoid application of the percentage cap altogether in order to equalize the tax positions between the two classes and reduce its tax liability to $0;”
  2. Correctly paid state corporate net income taxes for the 2014 tax year by utilizing the percentage cap under the 2014 NLC deduction provision; and
  3. Thus is not entitled to a state corporate net income tax refund.

The Court also held that the taxpayer is not entitled to a tax refund remedy pursuant to the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the US Constitution or the Remedies Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Please contact us with any questions.

 

—

Kenn Stoops (Philadelphia)

Managing Director

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Stacy Ip-Mo (Philadelphia)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Bob Kovach (Pittsburgh)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

John Damin (Philadelphia)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP



Back to top
 
In this issue

Income/Franchise
California FTB Posts Implementation Guidance on Newly Enacted Elective PTE Tax

Florida DOR Announces Temporary Corporate Income Tax Rate Reduction from 4.458% to 3.535%

Maine Revenue Services Summarizes New Bright-Line Nexus Standard for Corporate Income Tax

Pennsylvania Court Upholds DOR Policy that 2017 NOL Cap Ruling Doesn’t Apply to Earlier Years

Sales/Use
California: Proposed Changes to Drop Shipment Rule Address Marketplace Sales Transactions

Florida: Proposed Rules Reflect New Remote Seller and Marketplace Laws and Rounding Algorithm

Illinois DOR Addresses Impact of Drop Shipments in Calculating Economic Nexus Threshold

Indiana DOR Addresses Impact of Drop Shipments in Calculating Economic Nexus Threshold

Nevada: US District Court Says Streaming Entertainment Companies Don’t Owe Local Franchise Fees

Utah Administrative Guidance Addresses Implementation of Marketplace Facilitator Provisions

Multistate Tax Alerts



Helpful resources

Visit Deloitte.com

State tax Matters archive

Multistate Tax Alert archive

Read Accounting for Income Taxes

Join Dbriefs

Follow us on Twitter
Get the Tax@hand mobile app



Have a question?

If you have needs specifically related to this newsletter's content, send us an email to have a Deloitte Tax professional contact you.
 

Deloitte.com  | Manage email preferences  |  Legal  |  Privacy

30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0015
United States

About Deloitte
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. In the United States, Deloitte refers to one or more of the US member firms of DTTL, their related entities that operate using the “Deloitte” name in the United States and their respective affiliates. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more about our global network of member firms.

Copyright © 2021 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
36 USC 220506



Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google Plus Email