Deloitte
Multistate Tax  |  July 2, 2021
Global InSight
State Tax Matters
The power of knowing.
 

Print Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Sales/Use:
North Carolina County Court Says Tax Imposition on Sales Transactions at Issue is Unconstitutional

Case No. 20 CVS 7449, N.C. Super. Ct., Wake County (6/23/21). In a case involving an out-of-state commercial printer that sold printed materials to customers in North Carolina via common carrier, as well as to customers who had the printed materials delivered to third-party recipients with North Carolina addresses using a common carrier, a North Carolina superior court (Court) held that North Carolina does not have a sufficient transactional nexus with the sales at issue under the Commerce Clause to impose sales tax on such transactions under principles set forth in Dilworth, because title to the purchases passed to the customers and third-party recipients outside of North Carolina. While the opposing parties both made “compelling arguments regarding the impact of Dilworth, Complete Auto, and Wayfair on this case,” the Court concluded the following:

  • Complete Auto did not overrule “Dilworth formalism;”
  • Wayfair did not overrule the “Dilworth formalism;” and
  • Therefore, the Dilworth formalism “remains the law of the land.”

In doing so, the Court agreed with the out-of-state company that, under Dilworth, “a state sales tax survives scrutiny under the Commerce Clause only where the purchase of tangible personal property – i.e., the transfer of ownership from the seller to buyer – takes place in the taxing state.” The Court reasoned that the sales at issue should not be sourced to North Carolina under N.C.G.S. § 105-164.4B (2010) given that title passed to the purchasers and third-party recipients outside of North Carolina. Accordingly, because “Dilworth formalism” remains good law, imposing North Carolina sales tax on such transactions was deemed unconstitutional.

 

Note that this case was limited to the North Carolina sales tax, and it did not address a use tax collection requirement which often is imposed in similar situations by other jurisdictions without raising the same Commerce Clause concerns. Please contact us with any questions.

 

—

Joe Garrett (Birmingham)

Managing Director

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Kathy Saxton (Atlanta)

Managing Director

Deloitte Tax LLP

 

Ryan Trent (Charlotte)

Senior Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP

 



Back to top
 
In this issue

Administrative
Illinois: New Law Extends Statute of Limitations by 6 Months on Some Tax Claims and Deficiencies

Income/Franchise
Federal: Supreme Court Denies Hearing New Hampshire’s Challenge to Massachusetts Telework Rule

Arizona: Combined Reporting of Parent and Affiliates Deemed Necessary to Accurately Reflect Income

Florida: New Law Updates State Conformity to IRC and Contains Some Decoupling

Hawaii: New Law Says REITs Must Provide Specified Information with Return or Else Face Penalties

Hawaii: New Law Updates State Conformity to Internal Revenue Code

Illinois DOR Explains Foreign Dividend Reporting Changes for Corporate Filers Under New Law

Iowa: Adopted Rules Reflect State Treatment of Interest Expense Limitations under IRC §163(j)

Louisiana: New Law Extends Carryforwards of Some NOLs for an Indefinite Period

New Hampshire: New Law Lowers Rates on BPT and BET

South Carolina DOR Issues Guidance on State Conformity and Nonconformity to IRC

Gross Receipts/Other Miscellaneous
Ohio: Budget Bill Revises Commercial Activity Tax Gross Receipts Computation

Oregon: Amended CAT Rule Addresses Unitary Group Filing

Sales/Use
Kentucky DOR Summarizes New Tax Incentives for Commercial Mining of Cryptocurrency

Missouri: New Law Imposes Economic Nexus on Some Remote Sellers and Marketplace Facilitators

North Carolina County Court Says Tax Imposition on Sales Transactions at Issue is Unconstitutional

Washington: Certain Intercompany Transfers Under Centralized Money Management are Not Subject to Tax

Multistate Tax Alerts



Helpful resources

Visit Deloitte.com

State tax Matters archive

Multistate Tax Alert archive

Read Accounting for Income Taxes

Join Dbriefs

Follow us on Twitter
Get the Tax@hand mobile app



Have a question?

If you have needs specifically related to this newsletter's content, send us an email to have a Deloitte Tax professional contact you.
 

Deloitte.com  | Manage email preferences  |  Legal  |  Privacy

30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0015
United States

About Deloitte
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. In the United States, Deloitte refers to one or more of the US member firms of DTTL, their related entities that operate using the “Deloitte” name in the United States and their respective affiliates. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more about our global network of member firms.

Copyright © 2021 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
36 USC 220506



Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google Plus Email