Deloitte
Multistate Tax  |  May 21, 2021
Global InSight
State Tax Matters
The power of knowing.
 

Print Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Gross Receipts/Other Miscellaneous:
Nevada High Court Says 2019 Law Changes Impacting Modified Business Tax Rates are Invalid

Case No. 81924 (137 Nev., Advance Opinion 21), Nev. (5/13/21). In a case involving required legislative voting thresholds for passing rate extensions to Nevada’s modified business tax (MBT) – a quarterly payroll-based tax on businesses paying wages to employees in Nevada – the Nevada Supreme Court (Court) affirmed a district court opinion from 2020, which held that certain MBT-related sections of legislation enacted in 2019 [see S.B. 551 (2019) for more details on this 2019 enacted legislation] must be invalidated and are “void and stricken for lack of supporting votes of two-thirds of the members of the Senate in the 80th (2019) Legislative Session.” The Court explained that Article 4, Section 18(2) of the Nevada Constitution requires the agreement of at least two-thirds of the members of each house of the Nevada Legislature to pass any bill “which creates, generates, or increases any public revenue in any form, including but not limited to taxes, fees, assessments and rates, or changes in the computation bases for taxes, fees, assessments and rates.” According to the Court, the two 2019 bills at issue in this case did create, generate, or increase public revenue and because the bills did not pass by a two-thirds majority in the Nevada Senate, those portions of the bills that would require a supermajority vote are unconstitutional.

 

Included in the invalidated and stricken sections of one of the two 2019 bills at issue (i.e., within S.B. 551 (2019)) are provisions that:

  • Eliminate the rate adjustment procedure used by the Nevada Department of Taxation to determine whether the tax rates for the MBT must be reduced in any fiscal year based on whether specified combined revenue amounts exceed certain thresholds; and
  • Maintain and continue the legally operative rates of the MBT at 2% (generally applicable to certain financial institutions and mining companies) and 1.475% (generally applicable to all other business entities).

Note that, under state law generally, a business entity paying both the MBT and the Nevada Commerce Tax can take a credit against the MBT of a certain amount of the Nevada Commerce Tax it has paid. The Nevada Commerce Tax generally is imposed on each “business entity” (including disregarded entities) engaged in business in Nevada that has Nevada-sitused gross revenue in excess of $4 million annually at various rates that depend upon the industry in which the business entity is “primarily engaged” [see previously released Inside Deloitte article for more details on the Nevada Commerce Tax and MBT]. Please contact us with any questions.

 

—

Renae Welder (Los Angeles)

Principal

Deloitte Tax LLP

 



Back to top
 
In this issue

Article
GILTI High-Tax Exclusion: Impact on State Taxes

Administrative
Pennsylvania DOR Extends Voluntary Compliance Program for Retailers with In-State Inventory

Income/Franchise
Alabama: New Law Includes Credits for Owners of Passthroughs Electing Entity-Level Taxation

California FTB Issues Another Round of Draft Market-Sourcing Rule Changes with 6th IPM on June 4

Indiana Tax Court Says Company’s Receipts are Derived from Services for Sourcing Purposes

Kansas: New Law Includes Withholding Option for Businesses with Pandemic-Related Telecommuters

New Jersey: Notice Summarizes Instances When Combined Groups Must File Short Period Returns

Rhode Island: Duration of Emergency Withholding Rules for Pandemic-Related Telecommuting Extended

South Carolina: New Law Provides for Elective Passthrough Entity-Level Taxation

South Carolina: New Law Updates State Conformity to Internal Revenue Code

Vermont: US Supreme Court Denies Review of Case Allocating Capital Gain to Commercial Domicile

Gross Receipts/Other Miscellaneous
Nevada High Court Says 2019 Law Changes Impacting Modified Business Tax Rates are Invalid

Sales/Use
Florida DOR Issues Implementation Guidance on New Remote Seller and Marketplace Provider Law

Missouri: Pending Bill Imposes Economic Nexus on Some Remote Sellers and Marketplace Facilitators

Tennessee: New Law Allows Some Customers to File Sales Tax Refund Claims Directly with DOR

Washington DOR Addresses Taxability of Food Delivery Services Involving Online Marketplaces

Multistate Tax Alerts



Helpful resources

Visit Deloitte.com

State tax Matters archive

Multistate Tax Alert archive

Read Accounting for Income Taxes

Join Dbriefs

Follow us on Twitter
Get the Tax@hand mobile app



Have a question?

If you have needs specifically related to this newsletter's content, send us an email to have a Deloitte Tax professional contact you.
 

Deloitte.com  | Manage email preferences  |  Legal  |  Privacy

30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0015
United States

About Deloitte
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. In the United States, Deloitte refers to one or more of the US member firms of DTTL, their related entities that operate using the “Deloitte” name in the United States and their respective affiliates. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more about our global network of member firms.

Copyright © 2021 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
36 USC 220506



Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google Plus Email