Deloitte
Multistate Tax  |  March 26, 2021
Global InSight
State Tax Matters
The power of knowing.
 

Print Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Income/Franchise:
Utah: New Law Revises Provisions Involving NOLs, GILTI, FDII and Repatriated Dividends

S.B. 25, signed by gov. 3/22/21. Applicable with “retrospective operation for a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2021,” new law amends Utah corporate franchise and income tax provisions related to Utah net losses to clarify calculation of the 80% limitation on carrying forward a Utah net loss. For a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2021, the legislation states that the amount of Utah net loss that a taxpayer may carry forward to a taxable year may not exceed 80% of Utah taxable income computed without regard to the deduction of any Utah net loss. Among other revisions involving Utah net losses, the legislation provides that if a taxpayer carries forward a Utah net loss from a taxable year beginning before January 1, 2018, and a Utah net loss from a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2018, the Utah State Tax Commission “shall instruct the taxpayer to calculate” such 80% limitation by:

  1. Following federal guidance for calculating the 80% of taxable income limitation for federal income tax purposes; or
  2. If the Utah State Tax Commission determines that adequate federal corporate guidance on how to calculate the 80% limitation is unavailable, by:
    1. Calculating 80% of Utah taxable income before deducting any Utah net losses from Utah taxable income; and
    2. Applying the limitation that the Utah net loss that a taxpayer carries forward may not exceed 80% of Utah taxable income to Utah net losses incurred on or after January 1, 2018, without regard to Utah net losses from a previous taxable year that the taxpayer carries forward.

If the only Utah net loss that a taxpayer carries forward is from a taxable year that began before January 1, 2018, the new law provides that the Utah State Tax Commission:

  1. Must instruct the taxpayer to calculate such 80% limitation by following federal guidance for calculating the 80% taxable income limitation for federal income tax purposes; or
  2. If the Utah State Tax Commission determines that adequate federal corporate guidance on how to calculate the 80% limitation is unavailable, may not apply the 80% limitation to the Utah net loss.

H.B. 39, signed by gov. 3/22/21. Another recently signed bill with retrospective operation for the last taxable year of a taxpayer beginning on or before December 31, 2017, as well as a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2018, i) amends the statutory definition of “unadjusted income” to mean “federal taxable income as determined on a separate return basis before intercompany eliminations as determined by the Internal Revenue Code, before the net operating loss deduction and special deductions,” and ii) removes the reference to “for dividends received.” The legislation provides that Utah’s dividends received deduction includes amounts comprised in federal taxable income under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) sections 965(a) and 951A. The new law also specifically defines “special deductions” by providing that special deductions includes deductions under IRC sections 250 and 965(c). Please contact us with any questions.

 

—

Jason Clegg (Salt Lake City)

Managing Director

Deloitte Tax LLP

Brandon Hunt (Salt Lake City)

Manager

Deloitte Tax LLP



Back to top
 
In this issue

Income/Franchise
Federal: Mobile Workforce State Income Tax Simplification Bill Remains Pending in US House

Federal: Protecting Retirement Savers and Everyday Investors Bill Introduced in US House

Delaware Division of Revenue Addresses Pandemic-Related Telecommuting and Treatment of Wage Income

District of Columbia: New Emergency Legislation Allows Deduction for Apportioned NOL Carryover

Idaho: New Law Addresses CARES Act Excess Loss Limitations for Noncorporate Taxpayers

Maine: New Law Updates State Conformity to IRC, Addresses CARES Act Provisions and GILTI

New Jersey: Updated Combined Reporting Guidance Explains Sharing of Tax Credits and Carryovers

New Mexico: Adopted Rules Reflect Mandatory Combined Reporting Regime and Market-Based Sourcing

New York: Taxpayer Must Include Royalty Payments Received from Foreign Affiliates in Tax Base

Rhode Island: Duration of Emergency Withholding Rules for Pandemic-Related Telecommuting Extended

Utah: New Law Revises Provisions Involving NOLs, GILTI, FDII and Repatriated Dividends

Sales/Use/Indirect
Washington DOR Releases Draft Rule on Marketplace Facilitator Tax Collection and Reporting

Multistate Tax Alerts



Helpful resources

Visit Deloitte.com

State tax Matters archive

Multistate Tax Alert archive

Read Accounting for Income Taxes

Join Dbriefs

Follow us on Twitter
Get the Tax@hand mobile app



Have a question?

If you have needs specifically related to this newsletter's content, send us an email to have a Deloitte Tax professional contact you.
 

Deloitte.com  | Manage email preferences  |  Legal  |  Privacy

30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0015
United States

About Deloitte
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. In the United States, Deloitte refers to one or more of the US member firms of DTTL, their related entities that operate using the “Deloitte” name in the United States and their respective affiliates. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more about our global network of member firms.

Copyright © 2021 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
36 USC 220506



Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google Plus Email